You hear it all the time: “Leadership is not a title.”
It’s repeated so often it has almost become a truism. But what interests me most isn't the phrase itself—it’s what comes next. If leadership isn't a title, then what exactly is it? How would you answer that?
Having been a student of leadership for over 40 years, I’ve noticed we are often much better at defining what leadership isn’t than what it is. Truly great leaders come in so many different packages that crafting a universal definition can feel impossible.
But man, when you see it in action, the bells start ringing.
That’s what happened to me recently during a workshop I was co-leading. We were listening to participants share tough leadership challenges they had faced. Most of the stories were good, if not breathtaking. Then Jackie started talking, and the energy in the room completely shifted.
The Anatomy of a Rant
Jackie was describing a routine call she had to make to a new client regarding a project kick-off meeting. The client had requested a specific day and time, but Jackie’s firm had a scheduling conflict. Because the date was still a few weeks away, it was a minor inconvenience or a miscommunication at worst—certainly not a last-minute emergency.
But the man on the other end of the line didn't see it that way.
It was his first time ever speaking with Jackie. He didn’t know her, yet he went absolutely ballistic. He called her “unprofessional” and launched into an extended, angry rant. Caught completely off guard, Jackie didn't fire back. She simply apologized for the scheduling conflict, focused on finding a solution, and calmly told him they would work things out.
Listening to her story, I thought, “I don’t think 'unprofessional' describes HER at all!”
Jackie was ready to leave the story there, but I was fascinated. I had to know what happened next.
"How did it work out?" I asked.
“Oh, it’s fine,” she replied with a laugh. “We set another date, we’ve been working on the project together for several months now, and we actually work really well together. He’s apologized more than once.”
An Amazing Display of Humility
I’ll admit, I spent the next day processing that conversation. Before the next session started, I even asked Jackie to walk me through it again just to ensure I hadn't missed some trigger that caused the blowup. But there wasn't one.
What struck me hardest was her sheer nonchalance. She told the story as if she didn't even realize she had just displayed an extraordinary act of servant leadership.
This brings me to my personal definition of leadership—a synthesis of ideas I’ve curated over four decades:
“A leader is someone who has a positive impact on outcomes and people.”
Look at the sheer impact of Jackie's response. First, it was entirely positive. I don't subscribe to definitions of leadership that allow for negative outcomes. Dictators can influence masses, but negative or neutral outcomes don't equate to good leadership. We also frequently confuse professionalism with leadership; leadership requires professionalism, but being a professional isn't enough. True leaders actively create positive variance for the objectives and the people involved.
